Ladies and gentleman, I give you Donald Trump.....
White
House Staff ‘Hiding’ As Russia Chaos Engulfs West Wing
Asawin
Suebsaeng
MSN
White
House and administration officials are reeling at reports that Donald Trump reportedly shared classified
information with Russia’s top diplomats during an Oval Office meeting last
week.
It’s
the latest crisis jolting Trump’s senior staff in the week following the
chaotic fallout from the firing of FBI director James Comey—and especially
ironic considering the president’s repeated condemnations of Hillary Clinton
for her use of a private email server, which contained a handful of messages
deemed to be classified.
Communications
staff and senior staffers at the White House were literally “hiding in
offices,” according to a senior Trump aide, as a gaggle of White House press
stormed White House hallways just after the Washington Post story broke on Monday evening.
“Do
not ask me about how this looks, we all know how this looks,” the senior aide
told The Daily Beast on Monday evening. Trump administration officials spoke to
The Daily Beast on the condition of anonymity so as to speak freely. The aide
described a scene at the White House as tense and “a morgue,” where senior
officials such as Sean Spicer, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and Stephen Bannon
convened to sketch an immediate path forward in handling the aftermath.
According
to multiple reporters present, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster was
walking by at the time when he saw the crowd of journalists gathered outside
Spicer’s office. “This is the last place in the world I want to be,” McMaster
said, before ducking away for an hour til he head to brief the press.
Three
senior administration staffers expressed bewilderment and frustration at news
that Trump apparently shared highly classified information about ISIS threats
against the U.S. homeland with Russia’s foreign minister and ambassador to
Washington last week.
The meeting at which the
president reportedly divulged the information came a day after Trump fired the
head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which is investigating alleged
Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
The
White House quickly and adamantly pushed back on the Post’s reporting.
“This
story is false,” Deputy National Security Adviser Dina Powell said in a statement shortly after the story broke. “The
president only discussed the common threats that both countries faced.”
McMaster also called the story, “as reported,” false. “I was in the room. It
didn’t happen,” he said.
But
administration officials see the optics of the situation as catastrophic to an
administration struggling to deal with a torrent of news about the FBI’s
investigation, Comey’s firing, and increasingly loud calls for an independent
probe into the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russian officials.
“At
this point I’m wondering if we’ll ever be able to stop talking about Russia,” a
White House staffer said shortly after the Post story was published. “It’s
totally self-inflicted. Every time I feel like we’re getting a handle on the
last Russia fiasco, a new one pops.”
Asked
about the reported details of Trump’s meeting, the staffer declined to weigh in
on specifics but described publicly reported information as a body blow to the
White House’s image. “I don’t know what was said in the meeting, what the
classified information is, or really any of the details,” the staffer said. “I
just know how it looks, and obviously it looks really bad.”
When
another senior White House official was asked by The Daily Beast on Monday
night if this would accelerate President Trump’s demands for a
national-security leak crackdown, the aide simply replied, “Oh, definitely.”
The
official, who is familiar with Trump’s thinking on these matters, said it will
exacerbate “his animus and suspicion towards ‘Deep State’” and Obama-holdover
actors, who Trump and some of his closest advisors have suspected of trying to
damage his presidency through anonymous leaks to the press.
According
to the Post’s report—which The Daily Beast has not been able to
independently confirm—the president shared details of ISIS plots involving
explosives concealed in electronic devices and potentially smuggled aboard
U.S.-bound airlines. The administration has banned laptop computers from the
cabins of flights from ten airports in the Middle East and North Africa. It is
mulling a similar policy affecting all U.S.-bound flights from Europe.
McMaster
stressed to the Post that the information Trump shared with the Russians
contained no details about the “sources and methods” of intelligence gathering
by the U.S. and its allies. But according to the Post, the president did
divulge the city in ISIS territory where the source of the intelligence was
located.
The
Post report portrayed Trump as boastful of his intelligence sources. “I
get great intel. I have people brief me on great intel every day,” he
reportedly told the Russians.
Intelligence experts
worried during last year’s presidential campaign that Trump’s particular brand
of brash straight-talk might put key secrets at risk. “My concern with Trump
will be that he inadvertently leaks, because as he speaks extemporaneously,
he’ll pull something out of his hat that he heard in a briefing and say it,” a
former senior intelligence official told The Daily Beast last year.
Some
administration officials who supported Trump during the campaign said they were
appalled at his apparent divulging of U.S. secrets, and considered it a break
from his “America First” campaign mantra.
“With
news like this I’m beginning to wonder why Trump ran in the first place and if
he really cares about the country,” said a senior Trump appointee involved in
counter-ISIS policymaking. “I miss candidate Trump. Now he’s just a pathetic
mess.”
“I
doubt he did it to collude [with the Russians]. I think he’s dumb and doesn’t
know the difference,” a former FBI official who worked aspects of the Russia
investigation told The Daily Beast. “He thinks he’s arranging some business
deal except that he’s not.”
When
asked if they could use info in way that harms the U.S., this official said,
“of course.”
The
Russians, the source added, “like [Trump’s] mental instability and stupidity.
They don’t like his unpredictability.”
Candidate
Trump was vehement in his condemnations of the mishandling of classified
information, chiefly by Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. Her use of a private
email server to handle such information was a frequent Trump talking point—and
the subject of her own FBI investigation. That probe was led by James Comey,
the man Trump fired on Tuesday due, administration officials claimed before Trump publicly contradicted them,
to his handling of the Clinton investigation.
“Where
are all those folks who chanted ‘lock her up’?” quipped Rep. Gerry
Connolly, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, in reference to a
frequent Clinton-aimed chant at Trump campaign rallies.
At
this point, Trump does not appear to have done anything illegal; it is entirely
within the president’s authority to share classified information with whomever
he sees fit. “The president is the declassifying authority so no crime was
committed,” an FBI agent working on counterterrorism matters told The Daily
Beast.
And
that’s part of the problem, according to Mark Zaid, a well-known national
security lawyer.
“Time
after time we are seeing that our president has little to no understanding of
how the intelligence system and national security apparatus works, and our
biggest security vulnerability may be the one person who no one, other than
Congress, can take action against,” he said.
Congressional
Democrats quickly expressed concern over the reported leaks.
“We
need to be clear, we do not know if these allegations are true or false, but
if—IF—these allegations are true, President Trump may have just disclosed top
secret information to the Russians and possibly jeopardized an intelligence
source in the process,” wrote Reps. Elijah Cummings and John Conyers, the top
Democrats on the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, respectively. “This
is the same meeting in which Russian officials laughed with the President in
front of Russian photographers inside the Oval Office while members of the
American press were excluded.”
The
inclusion of a photographer from state-run Russian media outlet TASS drew condemnation even from
administration officials who said it let the Kremlin, notoriously skilled at
weaponizing information, set the public tone of the meeting. Photos released by
the Russian government revealed the presence of Amb. Sergey Kislyak, who was
not mentioned in the White House’s official summary of the event.
“If
[The Washington Post’s story is] true, this is a slap in the face
to the intel community,” said Sen. Mark Warner, vice-chairman of the
Senate Intelligence Committee. “Risking sources & methods is inexcusable,
particularly with the Russians.”
No comments:
Post a Comment