It's interesting that no one just says "Trump, you're a big, bloated, lying, scumbag fuckwad". It's actually kind of fun.......
Trump Stands Firm on
Claim That British Agency Helped Obama Spy on Him
By
PETER BAKER and STEVEN ERLANGER
WASHINGTON — Donald Trump
refused to back down on Friday after his White House aired an unverified claim
that Britain’s spy agency
secretly monitored him during last year’s campaign at the behest of President Barack Obama, fueling a rare rupture between
the United States and its most important international partner.
Although his aides in private conversations since Thursday night
had tried to calm British officials livid over the allegation, Mr. Trump made
clear that he felt the White House had nothing to retract or apologize for,
explaining that his spokesman was simply repeating an assertion made by a Fox
News commentator.
“We said nothing,” Mr. Trump told a German reporter who asked
about the matter at a joint White House news conference with Chancellor Angela
Merkel. “All we did was quote a certain very talented legal mind who was the
one responsible for saying that on television. I didn’t make an opinion on it.
You shouldn’t be talking to me about it. You should be talking to Fox.”
Mr. Trump, who has stuck by his unsubstantiated assertion that
Mr. Obama ordered his telephone tapped last year despite across-the-board
denials, wryly used Ms. Merkel’s visit to repeat his contention. Ms. Merkel was
angry during Mr. Obama’s administration at reports that the United States
tapped her telephone and those of other foreign leaders. Turning to her, Mr.
Trump said, “At least we have something in common, perhaps.”
A spokesman for Prime Minister Theresa May said on Friday that
the White House had backed off the allegation. “We’ve made clear to the
administration that these claims are ridiculous and should be ignored,” the
spokesman said on condition of anonymity in keeping with British protocol.
“We’ve received assurances these allegations won’t be repeated.”
Kim Darroch, the British ambassador to Washington, spoke with
Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, at a St. Patrick’s Day reception
in Washington on Thursday night just hours after Mr. Spicer aired the assertion
at his daily briefing. Mark Lyall Grant, the prime minister’s national security
adviser, spoke separately with his American counterpart, Lt. Gen. H.R.
McMaster.
“Ambassador Kim Darroch and Sir Mark Lyall expressed their
concerns to Sean Spicer and General McMaster,” a White House official said on
condition of anonymity to confirm private conversations. “Mr. Spicer and
General McMaster explained that Mr. Spicer was simply pointing to public
reports, not endorsing any specific story.”
Other White House officials, who also would not be named, said
Mr. Spicer offered no regret to the ambassador. “He didn’t apologize, no way,
no how,” said a senior West Wing official. The officials said they did not know
whether General McMaster had apologized.
The controversy over Mr. Trump’s two-week-old unsubstantiated accusation
that Mr. Obama had wiretapped his telephones last year continued to unnerve
even Mr. Trump’s fellow Republicans. Representative Tom Cole, Republican of
Oklahoma, said Friday that Mr. Trump had not proven his case and should tell
Mr. Obama he was sorry.
“Frankly, unless you can produce some pretty compelling truth, I
think President Obama is owed an apology,” Mr. Cole told reporters. “If he
didn’t do it, we shouldn’t be reckless in accusations that he did.”
The flap with Britain started when Mr.
Spicer, in the course of defending Mr. Trump’s original accusation against Mr.
Obama, on Thursday read from the White House lectern
comments by a Fox News commentator asserting that the British spy agency was
involved. Andrew Napolitano, the commentator, said on air that Mr. Obama had
used Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters, the signals agency known
as the GCHQ, to spy on Mr. Trump.
The GCHQ quickly and vehemently denied the contention on
Thursday in a rare statement issued by the spy agency, calling the assertions
“nonsense” and “utterly ridiculous.” By Friday morning, Mr. Spicer’s briefing
had turned into a full-blown international incident. British politicians
expressed outrage and demanded apologies and retractions from the American
government.
Mr. Trump’s critics assailed the White House for alienating
America’s friend. “The cost of falsely blaming our closest ally for something
this consequential cannot be overstated,” Susan E. Rice, who was Mr. Obama’s
national security adviser, wrote on Twitter. “And
from the PODIUM.”
Mr. Trump has continued to stick by his claim about Mr. Obama
even after it has been refuted by a host of current and former officials,
including leaders of his own party. Mr. Obama denied it, as did the former
director of national intelligence. The F.B.I. director has privately told other
officials that it is false. After being briefed by intelligence officials, the
Republican chairmen of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees have in the
last few days said they have seen no indication that Mr. Trump’s claim is true.
Mr. Spicer tried to turn the tables on those statements during
his briefing on Thursday by reading from a sheaf of news accounts that he
suggested backed up the Trump. Most of the news accounts, however, did not
verify Trump’s assertion, while several have been refuted by intelligence
officials.
For instance, Mr. Spicer read several stories from The New York
Times, which has written extensively on an investigation into contacts between
associates of Mr. Trump and Russian officials. The Times has reported that
intelligence agencies have access to intercepted conversations as part of that
investigation. But it has never reported that Mr. Obama authorized the
surveillance, nor that Mr. Trump himself was monitored.
Representative Devin Nunes of California, a Republican and the
chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said this week that “it’s
possible” Mr. Trump or others were swept up in the course of other
surveillance, but when it came to Trump’s assertion that Mr. Obama authorized
tapping of Trump Tower, “clearly Trump was wrong.”
His Senate counterpart, Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina,
issued a joint statement on Thursday with Senator Mark R. Warner of Virginia,
the top Democrat on the intelligence committee, saying they saw “no indications
that Trump Tower was the subject of surveillance by any element of the United
States government either before or after Election Day 2016.”
In pointing the finger at Britain on Thursday, Mr. Spicer read
from comments made by Mr. Napolitano on Fox this week. “Three intelligence
sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of
command,” Mr. Spicer read. “He didn’t use the N.S.A., he didn’t use the C.I.A.,
he didn’t use the F.B.I., and he didn’t use the Department of Justice. He used
GCHQ.”
“What is that?” Mr. Spicer continued. “It’s the initials for the
British intelligence spying agency. So simply, by having two people saying to
them, ‘Trump needs transcripts of conversations involved in candidate Trump’s
conversations involving Trump,’ he was
able to get it and there’s no American fingerprints on this.”
In London, outrage quickly followed. “It’s complete garbage.
It’s rubbish,” Malcolm Rifkind, a former chairman of Parliament’s intelligence
committee, told BBC News.
GCHQ was the first agency to warn the American government,
including the National Security Agency, that Russia was hacking Democratic
Party emails during the presidential campaign. That warning stemmed from internet
traffic out of Russia containing malware, British officials said.
British officials and analysts were surprised at the tough and
vehement language in the GCHQ response, especially from an agency that
traditionally refuses to comment on any intelligence matter.
There was some annoyance and eye-rolling as well. Tim Farron,
leader of the Liberal Democrats, the junior partner in the last British
coalition government, described Mr. Spicer’s repetition of the claims as
“shameful” and said Mr. Trump was “compromising the vital U.K.-U.S. security
relationship to try to cover his own embarrassment.”
Dominic Grieve, the current intelligence committee chairman in
Parliament, noted that no president can task the GCHQ and pointed to elaborate
safeguards that prevent spying on the United States and require “a valid
national security purpose” for any monitoring. “It is inconceivable that those
legal requirements could be met in the circumstances described,” he said in a
statement.
But Downing Street clearly wanted to avoid adding to any
embarrass-ment in Washington while making it clear that Britain had no part in any such wiretapping, and that Britain would not be a party to circumventing the laws of another closely allied country. “We have a close relationship which allows us to raise concerns when they arise, as was true in this case,” the prime minister’s spokesman said. “This shows the administration doesn’t give the allegations any credence.”
embarrass-ment in Washington while making it clear that Britain had no part in any such wiretapping, and that Britain would not be a party to circumventing the laws of another closely allied country. “We have a close relationship which allows us to raise concerns when they arise, as was true in this case,” the prime minister’s spokesman said. “This shows the administration doesn’t give the allegations any credence.”
British officials said that Britain initiated calls of complaint
and denial to the White House after Mr. Spicer’s briefing. They also said that
British officials had discussed responding earlier, after Mr. Napolitano’s
comments were made on air, but acted quickly after those remarks were repeated
by the president’s official spokesman.
“I doubt if there will be any long-term damage — the intelligence links between the U.S. and the U.K. are just too strong,” said Peter Westmacott, a former British ambassador to the United States. “It was unfortunate that the White House spokesman repeated what he’s heard on Fox News without checking the facts. But once he’d done so, GCHQ had no choice but to set the record straight.”
“I doubt if there will be any long-term damage — the intelligence links between the U.S. and the U.K. are just too strong,” said Peter Westmacott, a former British ambassador to the United States. “It was unfortunate that the White House spokesman repeated what he’s heard on Fox News without checking the facts. But once he’d done so, GCHQ had no choice but to set the record straight.”
No comments:
Post a Comment